BEGIN TYPING YOUR SEARCH ABOVE AND PRESS RETURN TO SEARCH. PRESS ESC TO CANCEL

Big Sis Says Cyber Attack WILL Bring Down Power Grid: ‘When Not If’

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Pin on PinterestShare on RedditShare on TumblrEmail this to someone

(Truthstream Media.com)

The power grid as we know it is destined to fail, if you believe the authorities. Who will be there to pick up the pieces and patch it back together?

Outgoing Homeland Security chief Janet Napolitano issued an ‘open letter’ to her successor warning that a cyber or physical event that knocks out the power grid will occur – and it is not a question of “if” but “when.”

Notoriously known as “Big Sis” for her role at the Orwellian mega-agency, she claims the supposed ‘imminent’ event will pose challenges to all aspects of life, and make powering homes, providing food and facilitating transportation difficult. Napolitano seems so sure, one wonders how she knows that such a catastrophe is not only possible, but sure to happen, as she prepares to officially leave office September 6th.

ABC News reports: The outgoing Homeland Security Secretary has a warning for her successor: A massive and “serious” cyber attack on the U.S. homeland is coming, and a natural disaster — the likes of which the nation has never seen — is also likely on its way.

These are not Napolitano’s first comments on the subject; instead, they’ve been a frequent an unnerving talking point. Watch the video:

To that end, FBI terrorism experts – operating under the Homeland Security umbrella –  are staging a massive emergency drill dubbed GridEx II [PDF] for grid takedown scenarios in November that will include North America-wide agency officials, including those from Mexico and Canada.

Emphasizing the fear of disruption on a scale “only hinted at” by Hurricane Sandy and 9/11, these administrators and experts claim an infrastructure attack “could black out vast areas of the continent for weeks; interrupt supplies of water, gasoline, diesel fuel and fresh food; shut down communications.”

What is clear from both Hurricane Sandy, 9/11 and other events such as Hurricane Katrina is that the typical response to from governments is to soak up massive amounts of funding while hampering actual relief efforts through late and inept management of disasters. While anecdotal evidence like the FEMA office “closed due to weather” in the aftermath of Hurricane Sandy and many aspects of the delayed and deadly Hurricane Katrina response make this travesty abundantly clear, a recent GAO report has made this conclusion official.

CYBER ATTACK LIKELY TO TAKE DOWN GRID

The nation’s outdated power grid has spurned expectations that it is vulnerable, which for some experts, seems to beg an attack.

House Democrats issued a report in May 2013 claiming not only that the power grid was vulnerable to cyber attack, but that it faced threats on a daily basis. One utility cited in the report incredibly [as in, without credibility] claimed that it faced 10,000 attempts at a takedown per month.

Rep. Ed Markey, who co-authored the House Democrat’s controversial Climate Bill in 2010 – that would have taxed carbon dioxide and imposed new regulations on many aspects of ordinary life – played to the dangers, stating “With one well-placed keystroke, Americans could be plunged into darkness and chaos through the damage to our electric grid.” Markey emphasized the the threat of attack by foreign armies, adding “Foreign enemies are employing Web warriors to attack our way of life, and it’s time that our actions respond to the potential threat.”

Now, security experts are warning that bank and utilities (with power grids chief among those utilities) could be targeted for take down by Syrian or Iranian hackers in retaliation for strikes on Syria (the New York Times and Twitter take downs have already been attributed to the Syrian Electronic Army).

A story hyping the threat even quoted the dreaded former Homleand Security chief Michael Chertoff, who has profited handsomely off of post-9/11 security measures, including Rapiscan body scanners whose implementation he lobbied for as a former security official in the wake of the attempted terror attack by the Underwear Bomber patsy.

“The line between national security and private security is eroding,” said Chertoff, founder of a Washington consulting company. “It is a reasonable concern to be prepared for the possibility of some kind of retaliation — asymmetric retaliation — if we take action in Syria.”

In 2009, the NSA – embroiled in an ongoing controversy over its illegal surveillance – was granted authority over US CYBER COMMAND which monitors cyber activity and conducts offensive strikes, as well as defensive maneuvers in a globalized and electronic world.

Another possibility for taking down the grid involves Electromagnetic Pulse weapons or EMP. Boeing and the Air Force U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory successfully tested an EMP missile over Utah last year as part of the Counter-electronics High-powered Microwave Advanced Missile Project (CHAMP).

QUI BONO? A NEWER, SMARTER GRID WAITING IN THE WINGS

A massive power grid failure would negatively affect almost everyone, for sure. But failure is expected, and there are those, as with all disasters, who stand to benefit from it – often via contracts and construction costs.

Under this scenario, “smart grid” and “green energy” proponents who are in the process of implementing smart meters and other features of the coming new system – which will tie massive amounts of analyzable tracking data to power usage at the household and even appliance level – could indeed benefit from the rebuilding.

In fact, the current grid is considered inadequate for the needs of the designed ‘intelligent’ power grid that will facilitate two way communication and advanced monitoring, much less electric-powered vehicles.

The National Grid company website explains:

A smart grid is an “intelligent” electricity distribution network that uses two-way communications, advanced sensors and controls, advanced meters, and computers that can help reduce customers’ energy use, improve the efficiency and reliability of the electricity grid, facilitate the connection of distributed generation facilities to the system, and optimize the integration of renewable energy systems.

It also includes in-home energy management systems and intelligent controls in appliances […] We expect the Smart Grid to play an important role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and other pollutants, especially in how it can facilitate the connection of large amounts of renewable energy—more than is possible with the current electricity distribution system.

It is also expected to be an important enabler for electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid vehicles, two promising technologies that can help dramatically reduce oil consumption. [emphasis added]

According to the Environmental Defense Fund, an environmental group whose president attended to the 2012 Bilderberg meeting, this means new investments will be needed to fund the new infrastructure. And, course, people will have to agree to the new plans:

New investments are coming: An estimated $1.5 trillion will be spent upgrading our electric grid infrastructure over the next 25 years. But how should it be spent—building ever larger versions of Edison’s machine? […]

The alternative is building a smart, “green” grid that maximizes efficiency and reduces waste.

“This country is going to spend a ton of money upgrading the grid,” says Jim Marston, EDF vice president for energy. “The question is whether we just replace the old system or create a new one open to innovative, clean technologies.” [emphasis added]

Smart Grid: IBM Energy Efficient Smart Grids for a Smarter Planet

These statements and others like them make clear that for the newer, smarter grid to emerge (and allow the behaviorizing of society to accelerate), the old power grid must fall. With the widespread claims of frequent attempts at taking it down via a cyber attack, disabling these utilities would be believable enough, even if it weren’t clear who the real perpetrators were.

(Wink-wink ;) Catch our drift? Probably the ‘terrorists.’)

Aaron Dykes and Melissa Melton

Aaron and Melissa created TruthstreamMedia.com as an outlet to examine the news, place it in a broader context, uncover the deceptions, pierce through the fabric of illusions, grasp the underlying factors, know the real enemy, unshackle from the system, and begin to imagine the path towards taking back our lives, one step at a time, so that one day we might truly be free...

6 Comments

  1. ” There are always subcategories for poetry, photography, even pottery! |モンクレール ダウン メンズ 2014 Youtube|When did writing get dumped from the arts? And isn’t writing entertaining?As I continued my search, at a few sites I found some subcategories for history, but I don’t want to be stuck under such categories as “Reference and Education We blog about our little triumphs and our little questions With the extra you save pay for some private instruction At that point her mother burst into tears saying that she could hardly wait to show the dress/or blogs The many computer magazines on the newsstand, including Computer Shopper, Computer World and others, are great sources of reviews on virtually every kind of computer equipment, including hard drives, |Big Sis Says Cyber Attack WILL Bring Down Power Grid: ‘When Not If’ – Truthstream Media| DVD drives, printers and much more

  2. WorldWatchman

    I did leave one question out of my last post. Why isn’t the government using this advanced technology to do a first strike against our enemies? If they’re constantly working to take us down, wouldn’t it be wise to hit them first? This is something I’ve wanted for a long time. Our enemies, at least, most are the free world’s enemies as well. I strongly believe the leaders of free world countries would support this act. It would bring more peace to the earth and reduce our enemies to mere spectators in world events.

  3. WorldWatchman

    Nature or by a muslim country, North Korea, China or possibly by a country like Venezuela because the government thinks it can’t. There’s also the possibility of an invasion when this takes place because communications will be out unless the military already has a plan in place. It’s going to get real nasty. There will be riots in the streets and a gunslinger mentality. It will be like stepping back to the mid 1800’s.

    • American Patriot

      Israhell is no doubt working up a false flag operation that will put the blame on the Muslims like they tried with their 9-11 ploy.

  4. Marty (BSEE)

    The vast majority of the electrical system will not change. Other than the eventual debut of superconducting high capacity transmission lines, generators, and transformers, the change consists of a bunch of remotely controlled switches, and load sensors to gather the information so as to know when to turn the switches on, and off. The grid will be managed in a new way, but it will almost entirely be the same old grid. There is so much hype associated with this. The better management will make some new generation, and transmission lines unnecessary, so it will save utility consumers money, if the states don’t give all the savings to the utilities.

Leave a comment

Please be polite. We appreciate that. Your email address will not be published and required fields are marked

Current ye@r *