170 Scientific Studies Retracted Since 2013 for Blatant Fraud, Rigged Peer Reviews

Science & Tech

Editor’s Note: And that’s probably just scratching the surface. What’s really surprising is that anyone actually caught these and did anything about it. But they’re waiving the banner of SCIIIIIEEEEENNNNCE! Who actually pays attention anymore to whether or not what they are actually saying is true? It’s sciiiiiiiieeeence!

Via Retraction Watch:

BioMed Central is retracting 43 papers, following their investigation into 50 papers that raised suspicions of fake peer review, possibly involving third-party companies selling the service.

In November 2014 we wrote about fake peer reviews for Nature; at that point there had been about 110 retractions across several journals. The addition of 16 retractions by Elsevier for the same reason, and today’s 43 from BMC, brings retractions resulting from the phenomenon up to about 170.

BMC has also contacted institutions regarding 60 additional papers that were rejected for publication, but seem to be part of the same kind of scam. Regarding the third-party agents, BMC senior editor of scientific integrity Elizabeth Moylanwrites:

Some of the manipulations appear to have been conducted by third-party agencies offering language-editing and submission assistance to authors. It is unclear whether the authors of the manuscripts involved were aware that the agencies were proposing fabricated reviewers on their behalf or whether authors proposed fabricated names directly themselves.

(read more)

Leave a Reply